Delivery promises lack basis
When taking an order, it is hard to quickly tell whether capacity and materials suffice. Dates are quoted from experience, and delays follow.
Put orders, materials, routings and capacity into one model to build production plans that are executable, committable and adjustable, so delivery answers move from "roughly" to "well-founded".
In high-mix, low-volume electronics manufacturing with frequent rush orders, scheduling by spreadsheet and experience can hardly balance delivery, materials, changeovers and capacity at once.
When taking an order, it is hard to quickly tell whether capacity and materials suffice. Dates are quoted from experience, and delays follow.
Shortages surface only after work orders are released. Last-minute changes disrupt the line and hold up later orders.
Time for changing materials, programs, stencils and fixtures is overlooked, and poor sequencing causes heavy changeover waste.
After a rush order, equipment failure or shortage, manual rescheduling is slow and the impact on other orders is unclear.
It takes in orders and forecasts upstream, releases to MES for execution downstream, and receives execution progress back, forming a closed loop of plan, execute, feedback and adjust.
Modules follow the logic of demand, constraints, scheduling, adjustment and analysis. Deploy them together, or start with plan visualization and expand step by step to finite capacity scheduling.
Manage sales orders, forecasts and due dates in one place, and separate regular orders from rush orders by priority.
Customer Orders · Forecast · Rush OrdersBuild weekly and monthly production plans by product, quantity, date and plant as input to detailed scheduling.
Weekly Plan · Monthly PlanCombine BOM, inventory, in-transit stock and substitute materials to identify shortages and treat them as scheduling constraints.
PCB · IC · Passives · Structural PartsDefine operation sequence and standard times as the basis for scheduling.
SMT → DIP → Assembly → TestModel lines, equipment, personnel, fixtures and skills, and define which operations each resource can perform.
SMT Line · ICT · FCTCombine UPH, shifts and equipment capability to calculate each resource's available capacity over time.
8H / 12H · Two Shifts · OvertimeBreak orders down to operations and assign them to specific resources and times, producing a plan accurate to the line and hour.
Order → Operation → Resource → Start / EndOptimize sequencing based on the changeover time matrix to cut losses from changing materials, programs, stencils and fixtures.
Changeover MatrixCalculate material available dates and gaps at scheduled times, warn of shortages early and give the kitting-complete date.
Available Date · ShortageReschedule dynamically after rush orders, equipment failures or shortages, and assess the impact on other orders.
RescheduleSimulate options such as overtime, added equipment, outsourcing and due-date changes, then decide after comparing scenarios.
Scenario ComparisonShow on-time delivery, capacity load, bottleneck resources and plan adherence to reveal improvement opportunities.
OTD · Capacity Load · Bottleneck · Capacity HeatmapOnce in the system, orders pass through master planning, constraint checks and detailed scheduling to become a releasable production plan.
Distinguish customer orders, forecasts and rush orders and sequence them by due date and priority. Plan products, quantities and plants by week and month, so capacity gaps surface early.
Use BOM, inventory, in-transit stock and substitute materials to determine the earliest start date, with early shortage alerts, so plans are not released without materials.
Schedule finite capacity by operation, resource and time slot, create work orders and assign lines. Progress is returned for rolling adjustment.
Scheduling considers routings, resource capability, shift calendars and material availability together. The output is not a quantity target but a timetable that can be executed.
The system breaks orders down to operations by routing, calculates available capacity from the resource model, UPH and shifts, and weighs due date, priority and changeover cost to assign operations to specific resources and time slots. Operation sequence is enforced automatically.
Lines, equipment, personnel, fixtures and skills are modeled together, defining the resource combinations available for each operation.
Supports calendars for 8H, 12H, two-shift and overtime patterns, and calculates daily available capacity per resource.
SMT, DIP, assembly and test operations are linked in order, and upstream and downstream times are matched automatically.
Show order schedules on a Gantt chart and resource capacity on a load chart, making bottlenecks obvious at a glance.
Changeover time and material gaps are the two main reasons plans fail in electronics plants. They should be calculated at scheduling time, not discovered during execution.
Material differences between products determine the changeover workload and feed the changeover time estimate.
Equipment program switch time counts toward changeover cost, reducing unnecessary program changes.
Stencil change and preparation time is built into sequencing, so similar products run consecutively.
Test and assembly fixture switching accounts for fixture availability and changeover time.
A Changeover Matrix records switch times between products and guides the production sequence.
Kitting analysis checks materials against the scheduled start time and gives available dates and gaps. Risks surface in the planning stage, so purchasing and warehouse have time to respond.
Change is the norm. The system recalculates quickly when changes occur and puts the results of different options side by side before you decide.
Recalculate after adding a rush order to see the affected orders and delay time, then decide whether to accept it.
When equipment is unavailable, move affected operations to other resources or adjust the sequence.
When materials arrive late, schedule orders that can start first to reduce line waiting.
Keep updating the plan from actual execution progress so it always stays close to the shop floor.
Schedule each option separately, compare delivery, capacity load and changeover counts, and choose the better one.
The confirmed scenario is released straight to execution with no re-entry, and the decision process is traceable.
Comparing schedules with execution data helps planners find bottlenecks, assess plan quality and keep optimizing.
Track on-time order delivery and analyze causes of delay by customer and product.
Show each resource's load rate over time to identify overload and idle capacity.
Locate the resources and operations limiting overall output to guide improvement and investment.
Compare planned and actual output and analyze deviations by line, shift and date.
A plan's credibility comes from execution data. APS works with the manufacturing operations systems so plans, materials and equipment status confirm one another.
Sync production orders, products and routing-related master data as planning input.
Schedules are released as work orders and line plans; actual progress returns for adherence analysis and rescheduling.
Read inventory and in-transit stock for kitting analysis; activating a work order triggers staging tasks.
Equipment status, maintenance and failure information affect resource capacity, and plans avoid downtime windows.
For discrete manufacturing with high mix, low volume, tight deadlines and frequent changeovers.
Run similar products consecutively to cut changeover time and raise line utilization.
Assess the impact of rush orders quickly and compare scenarios before replying to customers.
Know kitting dates ahead of time and schedule orders that can start first to reduce line stoppage.
Schedule SMT, DIP, assembly and test in sequence and pinpoint bottleneck resources.
Common questions about APS concepts, finite capacity scheduling and rescheduling.
APS is an advanced planning and scheduling system for manufacturers, focused on turning orders into executable production plans under material, equipment, capacity and process constraints. ERP handles order and resource planning, APS optimizes the schedule, and MES executes it on the shop floor. Working together, the three form a closed loop from order and scheduling to production feedback.
When scheduling, APS considers order demand, equipment capability, production lines, material readiness, routings and changeover constraints, assigning production tasks to specific resources and time slots. Compared with manual scheduling in Excel, finite capacity scheduling identifies resource conflicts in advance and uses visual plans to help planners quickly adjust production sequences.
When rush orders, equipment failures, material shortages or due date changes make the original plan unworkable, APS can reschedule with order insertions or run What-if simulations against the new constraints, comparing how different options affect capacity and delivery dates. Actual scheduling results depend on how complete the base data is for equipment capacity, routings and materials.
Unify demand, materials, routings and capacity to build planning and scheduling that is executable, adjustable and analyzable.
Follow & Contact Us
Copyright © 2019-2026 Shanghai Hegong Software Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Public Security No. 31011502014114
Shanghai ICP No. 19036824-1